Taylor Swift doesn't think music streaming services appropriately value her art and she considered to assess her effort the people have to pay enough money for it. Taylor critique streaming because it says it does reduce the number of album sales. All singers put a lot of dedication in the songs and it isn't fair that people hear those songs free.
Taylor told reporters: "With Beats Music and Rhapsody you have to pay for a premium package in order to access my albums. And that places a perception of value on what I've created. On Spotify, they don't have any settings, or any kind of qualifications for who gets what music. I think that people should feel that there is a value to what musicians have created, and that's that. I wrote about this in July, I wrote an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. This shouldn’t be news right now. It should have been news in July when I went out and stood up and said I'm against it. And so this is really kind of an old story."
Spotify claims to have paid $ 2M to Universal (The people who have the rights to Swift's music) but don't know if Taylor saw that much or too little.
In my opinion:
Swift is right because singers work hard on his music to like people and if people can hear all your work without paying anything, I think this isn't fair. We also have to say that although there Spotify people can listen music for free on youtube. Also, there are more and more internet pirate music and they didn't pay anything singers at least spotify pay an amount, although not enough.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada